part 1:
Discussion Overview
Your first discussion will be non-graded/contribute only, and this is to give you a chance to get acquainted with the course materials, and meet each other, as well as acquire a text book (if you haven’t done so already) and begin reading.
The purpose of this discussion is to exchange ideas on the topic and to begin to participate.
Non-Graded Discussion on: Introductions
Description: Requires a post and response to two classmates as well.
Objectives
- Discuss the prompt and get to know others in the class.
- Comprehend and explore various ideas.
Requires a post and responses to two classmates as well.
- Discuss any questions you have about the syllabus.
- Tell us what you are majoring in and what your profession is/will be.
- Tell us briefly about a philosophical thought you have or have had, and what interests you in philosophy.
Reply to two classmates.
Netiquette
As you read and respond to others’ posts, keep in mind some basic rules for netiquette:
-
-
- Be kind and respectful to others
- Use full sentences
- Don’t use too much jargon
- Treat others online as you wish to be treated
- Use language that supports others
-
Grading & Feedback
How students will be graded:
- Anticipated turn-around time: 24-48 hours
- The criteria is outlined in the rubric. Click the “options” (3-dots) menu at the top of the page to see the rubric for this discussion.
- I will read your posts and go in and out of the discussion. But it is non graded.
Canvas Guides
Here are some Canvas guides you can use to help you navigate discussion posts and submit your discussion replies
Part 2:
Discussion Overview
Discuss the following: the Myth of the Cave by Plato, and Story of a Good Brahmin by Voltaire – required. Answer the questions as a post andrespond to two peers. 20 pts.
The purpose of this discussion is to:
- Begin to understand philosophical reasoning
- Compare and contrast implicit reasoning, concepts, and arguments.
To achieve the objective(s),
- Read 1.6
- Read Myth of the Cave and Story or a Good Brahmin
- Watch videos in the module
The purpose of the assignment is to begin to do philosophy.
See the directions for more details.
Outcomes and Objectives
Student Learning Outcomes
- Demonstrate knowledge of the principles of correct reasoning and apply these
principles to the evaluation of opinions and prospective beliefs.
Objectives
- Comprehend and interpret short philosophical readings throughout the semester.
Instructions
Initial Post:
Answer the following questions with the intention of comparing similarities among the two stories.
- Compare and contrast implicit reasoning, concepts, and arguments.
Please number items/questions, or bullet them:
Myth of the Cave and Story of a Good Brahmin:
- Discuss the symbolism in the stories, including their similarities and differences. For example: The prisoners are mankind. The Brahmin is like the philosopher in the Myth of the Cave. The old woman is like the prisoners. What other symbols do you find?
- What is Plato saying about education/knowledge in this allegory? How is it important for us as critical thinkers in this day and age?
- In Story of a Good Brahmin: What conclusion does the narrator arrive at towards the end about the value of reason? Do you see any parallels with the Myth of the Cave’s conclusion?
Reply Posts(s):
Answer the questions listed above as a post and respond to two peers. 20 pts.
Netiquette
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.