Understanding Barriers and Facilitators in Palliative Care f…

write an integrative literature review pn the topic:Understanding Barriers and Facilitators in Palliative Care for People Who Use Drugs: A UK Secondary Care Enquiry. Use 10 primary research articles published in the last 5 years, Project Title (maximum 20 words): Concise description of project: Needs to focus on a practice-based problem appropriate to your field of nursing. Informative needs to tell the reader what the project is about. Accurate do not mislead. Succinct and clear – avoid being overly complex. Designed to stimulate interest. Abstract (Approx. 300 words): Brief overview of the topic Purpose of the enquiry Method of literature integration Key findings and implications ________________________________________2. Introduction (Approx. 300 words): This section addresses learning outcome 1 (LO1) Contextualise the topic within your professional practice Introduce the research question(s) Outline the structure of the review ________________________________________ 3. Background (Approx. 1,200 words): This section addresses learning outcome 1 (LO1) Area and topic, and its origins of interest. Background and context this lead up to how the research question was framed. State the rationale for the enquiry Reflection on outcome how the proposed research will answer the question(s), why the research is worth doing and what is the significance and contribution of the study. A brief overview of key literature showing how your investigation may differ from or complement existing knowledge, referring to existing research findings on the topic area. Highlight the gaps in knowledge and link it to the background information to the need for enquiry 3.2 Aims and Objectives Identify: Overall aim – to answer the research question. Specific objectives specifically how the research question will be answered. 3.3 Research Question Succinct and clear research question, it needs to be linked to the project title. It needs to be explorable through literature (secondary research). It must be open to critical evaluation and able to lead to actionable insights. ________________________________________ 4. Methodology of Literature Review (Approx. 1,000 words): This section addresses learning outcome 2 (LO2) Define integrative literature review by Whittemore and Knafl (2005) and justify its use, critically discuss the strengths and limitations of IRL and apply to your project. Key research question(s) statement of purpose about what you are trying to find out, consider formulating this as a PICO / PEO question. Describe: Search strategy (databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria) Selection process – The process for sifting and sorting the papers (Search terms, Boolean operators, Data bases). Methods used to extract data (Data extraction table in appendices, PRISMA diagram). 5. Critical Appraisal (Approx. 1,200 words): Identify a quality appraisal tool and use it to appraise your articles (e.g., MMAT, CASP). This needs to focus on methodology used in the article, sampling strategy, data collection methods and data analysis rather than trying to answer all the questions of the appraisal tool. ________________________________________ 6. Thematic Analysis of Literature (Approx. 1,800 words): This section addresses learning outcome 3 (LO3) State how the data will be managed and analysed. This will include providing an outline of the synthesis methods that will be used, detailing stages of the analysis process. Whitmore and Knalf (2005) 6 stages explored here. Outline what the 6 stages of data analysis are and identify 3-4 themes and how they were arrived at. This is supported by your selected papers thematic analysis Thematic analysis needs to clearly identify and apply thematic analysis framework such as Braun and Clarke (2006) or Whittemore and Knafl (2005). For a theme to be valid it needs to be supported by at least half the articles Use of quotes from the articles to support a theme is highly recommended. A table showing how articles contributed to the different themes must be included in the text or appendices to support the thematic analysis section. Organise findings into 24 key themes Theme 1: [e.g., Evidence-based interventions] Theme 2: [e.g., Interprofessional collaboration] Theme 3: [e.g., Service user perspectives] Critically evaluate: Strengths and weaknesses of evidence Relevance to your enquiry Gaps and contradictions ________________________________________ 7. Discussion (Approx. 1,000 words): This section addresses learning outcome 3 (LO3) Here, you need to discuss your themes in turn- this needs to be a critical discussion of the issues that you identified in your themes. Support this with policy documents and wider references etc Synthesize findings from literature and practice 8. Recommendations and Implication for Practice (Approx. 1000 words): Explore implications for: Your own practice Team or organisational practice Policy or service development Suggest solutions or innovations ________________________________________ 9. Conclusion (Approx. 500 words): This section addresses learning outcome 4 (LO4) Summarise key insights Revisit the research question and learning outcomes Reflect on your learning journey Identify next steps or future enquiry 10. References: Use consistent referencing style ( Harvard) Ensure all sources cited are included ________________________________________ 11. Appendices (if applicable): Search strategy table PRISMA flow diagram Critical appraisal checklists / table thematic analisis diagram data extraction table