The Rule of Law limits on Judicial deference to arbitral awa…

My Essay examines rule of law limits on judicial defences to setting aside international arbitral award in Singapore. I argue that public policy exception for setting aside is a constitutional backstop and that this is where the rule of law becomes acute. 1. I argue briefly that Arbitration is delegated power and that states tolerate it because national courts have a supervisory role and (very importantly, public policy exceptions are a constitutional backstop ) 2. I now analyse the question with Rule of law. both formal and substantive. The analysis here is important. its ok to use English cases, but better to have more singaporean cases. Feel free to use any credible sources. 3. Finally, I talk about hard cases. This should be a real case from Singapore The most useful text would be Gary BornPls also have a footnotes Bibliography is Oscola, Ive attached a booklet here