SW1023 INTEGRATIVE SOCIAL WORK AND ADDICTION STUDIES DISCUSS…

PLEASE RESPOND TO THE THREE CLASSMATES POST BELOW. MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK. SOURCES MMUST BE CITED IN APA 7TH EDITION FORMAT.

(CLASSMATE 1)

DISCUSSION 5:1

How does the DSM-5 classify criteria for comorbidity?

The DSM-5 does not have a section dedicated solely to classifying different co-occurring disorders. Instead, the DSM-5 classifies the criteria for comorbidity into separate diagnoses, and with the possibility that people may have multiple disorders. That means, if a person exhibits symptoms that meet the criteria for both disorders, both can be diagnosed. For example, if people meet the criteria for both substance use disorder and another mental health condition, both can be diagnosed. The emphasis is placed on how one condition might influence the presentation over another. For example, withdrawal symptoms can appear as depression. It would take a good month of abstinence to clarify whether a person is experiencing depression or if they are experiencing withdrawals (Van Wormer & Davis, 2018).

Obviously, if someone is homeless and experiencing depression and withdrawal, it would be difficult to differentiate what came first, the chicken or the egg. Z-codes, such as homelessness, can have an effect on people’s depression and environment. It would be imperative to do a little background assessment to see if the client was depressed before they were homeless, and or started using drugs.

n this case, if someone was experiencing all three, you would give them three diagnoses with comorbid symptoms.

Reference

Van Wormer, K., & Davis, D. R. (2018). Addiction treatment: A strengths perspective (4th edition).

(CLASSMATE 2)

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) does not classify comorbidity as a separate diagnosis but instead allows clinicians to diagnose multiple disorders when an individual meets the full diagnostic criteria for each condition. This means that if a person meets the criteria for both a substance use disorder and another mental health disorder, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, or anxiety; both conditions are documented and treated simultaneously rather than assuming one is simply a symptom of the other (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). The DSM-5 emphasizes careful clinical assessment to determine whether symptoms occur independently, are substance-induced, or are part of another mental health condition.

This approach is especially important when working with veterans. Many veterans experience high rates of co-occurring conditions such as PTSD, traumatic brain injury (TBI), chronic pain, and substance use disorders. According to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, PTSD and substance use disorders frequently occur together because some veterans may use substances to cope with trauma-related symptoms like hyperarousal, insomnia, or intrusive memories. The DSM-5 diagnostic framework helps clinicians identify each disorder separately so that treatment can address both the mental health condition and the substance use disorder at the same time.

For veterans, integrated treatment is considered best practice. Programs offered through the VA often combine trauma-focused therapies, medication management, and substance use counseling to address comorbidity. Treating both conditions together improves outcomes because untreated PTSD or depression can increase the risk of relapse, while ongoing substance use can worsen mental health symptoms. Understanding how the DSM-5 evaluates comorbidity therefore helps clinicians provide more accurate diagnoses and comprehensive care for veterans experiencing both mental health and substance use challenges.

References

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2023). Co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorder among veterans.

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

(CLASSMATE 3)

How does the DSM-5 classify criteria for comorbidity?

Within the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-5), the term comorbidity is not defined by a separate set of criteria but is established when an individual meets the full diagnostic criteria for more than one mental disorder at the same time (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). Each diagnosis is made independently regardless of symptoms to ensure both conditions are appropriately evaluated. According to Nordgaard et al. (2023), psychiatric comorbidity involves evaluating distinct disorders independently, grounded in established differential diagnostic methods. DSM-5 removed many of the hierarchical exclusion rules used in earlier editions, allowing multiple diagnoses to be given unless a specific disorder explicitly prohibits it (American Psychiatric Association, 2022). Clinicians utilize the DSM-V for differential diagnosis sections and not better explained by criteria to determine whether symptoms represent distinct co-occurring disorders rather than overlapping features of one condition and is very important associated with the discussion of comorbidity (Krueger & Markon, 2006).

Despite the large amount of research conducted in this area, comorbidity of psychiatric disorders remains a topic of major practical and theoretical significance that is often not overlooked (DellOsso & Pini, 2012). The definition of comorbidity varies depending upon the background of who is providing the context. For example, a medical professional would define Comorbidities as distinct health conditions that are present at the same time (verywell health, 2020).

Reviewing this material was very interesting considering how long I have been utilizing the DSM V, DSM IV, and DSM IV-TR when diagnosing and treating psychiatric patients but never really considered how comorbidity is defined within the DSM outside of my education and training in co-occurring disorders. With comorbidity being the foundational term prior to dual-disorder, dual-diagnosis and then transforming into co-occurring disorders it is interesting that the APA never completely defined the term.

Reference:

Dell’osso L, Pini S. What Did We Learn from Research on Comorbidity In Psychiatry?

Advantages and Limitations in the Forthcoming DSM-V Era. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:180-4. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010180. Epub 2012 Dec 10. PMID: 23304235; PMCID: PMC3537081.

Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach

to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213

Nordgaard, J., Nielsen, K. M., Rasmussen, A. R., & Henriksen, M. G. (2023). Psychiatric

comorbidity: a concept in need of a theory. Psychological Medicine, 53(13), 59025908.

Verywell Health. (2020, October 12). Comorbidities: Meaning and common examples.

Verywell Health.