Create a peer evaluation in APA Style, writing no more than 2 pages of a Microsoft word document using the framework below. The Presentation will be attached as a file.
Peer Evaluation Review Framework
Section 1: Advocacy Rationale
After reviewing the peer Module 7 PowerPoint, what type of advocacy rationale do you think is
being applied? Does your peer clearly state what rationale they are applying to justify the new
policy, or did you have to come to a conclusion about the rationale on your own? If your peer did
provide a rationale, do you agree with the justification provided by your peer?
Section 2: Policy Making Process
After your review of the peer Module PowerPoint, has all eight tasks of the policy making
process been applied to the analysis and evaluation of existing policies? What are the skills and
essential competencies applied by your peer to develop the new social policy?
Section 3: Building New Policy Agenda
During your review of the peer Module 7 PowerPoint, can you clearly see the diagnosis,
softening and moderating of context and activation of change to build new policy agenda? Does
the PowerPoint clearly apply the six steps of the Policy Analysis, Proposal-Writing, and
Presentation Framework for existing policy and their newly created policy?
Section 4: Fake News
Does the assigned peer Module 7 PowerPoint, identify fake news, misinformation, or
disinformation campaigns for existing policies? How does the PowerPoint address how social
media will be leveraged to promote the new policy?
Section 5: Policy Key Questions and Analysis
Does the peer Module 7 PowerPoint, use the Policy Key Questions and Policy Analysis tools?
What do the results tell you about existing policy options and the new policy presented by your
peer?
Section 6: Policy Challenges
After reviewing the peer Module 7 PowerPoint, what are the common policy challenges that you
have identified for the new policy presented in each of the PowerPoints?
Section 7: Policy Type
After reviewing the Module 7 PowerPoint, can you tell which one of the eleven policy types
were used? Was the research evidence used primary or secondary research? Was there any
indication that a quasi-experimental design was used to compare a control and intervention
groups?
Section 8: Policy Reform
After reviewing the peer Module 7 PowerPoint, what is the most advantageous policy reform
method for each new policy
Rubric:
- Provides a thorough review of all 8 sections of the Peer Evaluation Framework Review.
- Provides a comprehensive justification for each section of the Peer Evaluation Framework
- All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in problem Statement and listed in the references using APA format:
- Document Set up
- Title and reference pages
- Citations in the text and references
- No more than 2 pages
Requirements: No more than 2 pages not including the title and reference page.
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.