NUR 531 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric

Competency

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:

Apply a systems theory leadership approach to improve safety and quality

Overview

Inter professional leadership benefits from having several tools at the ready to meet the demands of the healthcare systems. These tools will help you do your analysis and make decisions based on the results. Quality improvement models typically focus on what is referred to as the Triple Aim. This includes improve the health of a population, improve the experience of care, and improve the costs related to providing care. There are many tools that could be used to assess healthcare systems. Some tools are applied proactively, others in response to an event, and others are used to evaluate outcomes. In this project, you will work with a sample of leadership tools that use a systems theory approach and can be applied in various practice settings to address improvements related to patients, populations, structures, procedures, and others. One of the most common analysis tools useful for strategic planning is the SWOT analysis. Some analysis tools that are used for problem solving include FMEA, flow charts, and root-cause analyses. A model of improvement is used to frame change initiatives and may include PDSA, Six Sigma, LEAN, and others. The ability to analyze data trends is also a valuable skill in any leadership role.

Scenario

The hospital you work for presents an annual innovation award internally to a nurse or nurse-led group who presents their work. Awards are given to nurses or nurse-led teams who implement a program, project, product, or practice that exemplifies innovation in the areas of patient safety and/or outcomes. The requirements to submit for the award include three major components called a toolbox. You plan to submit your toolbox for the annual innovation award using the following parts: Part 1: a proactive systems assessment, Part 2: a reactive systems assessment and quality improvement models, and Part 3: evaluate outcomes using data trends.

These three parts will be pieced together to showcase the work and present for your hospitals annual innovation award.

Directions

Construct a leadership toolbox in the form of a PowerPoint presentation. Include three sources to support your claims.

Specifically, your presentation should consist of the following three parts:

Part 1: Proactive Systems Assessment

Incorporate a proactive systems assessment. Consider the organization in which you are currently working. Conduct a SWOT analysis that focuses on the organizations ability to implement one of the following innovations into the strategic plan (chose one from the list):
1. Establishing a teen clinic for emancipated minors
2. Adopting the ANAs nurse staffing principles
3. Purchasing simulation manikin for central line training (e.g., Chester Chest)
4. Expanding the electronic health record to include an adverse event tracer
5. Sponsoring a bi-monthly (every two months) health screening clinic

Part 2: Reactive Systems Assessment and Quality Improvement Models

Incorporate a reactive systems assessment. Complete a root-cause analysis. Using the case study listed in the Supporting Materials section, complete a root-cause analysis.
1. Describe the tool.
2. Explain the purpose or use of that tool.
3. Describe how the selected tool is used in practice.
Determine a quality improvement model for an evaluation of outcomes.
1. Explain how the root-cause analysis taken from the case study applies to the quality improvement process within the framework of your chosen quality improvement model.

Part 3: Evaluate Outcomes Using Data Trends
Use the provided partial data set and address the following:

Identify trends in the data. Choose a cancer type to graph against demographics (either age or ethnicity) (example: number of cases of bone marrow cancer by age group)
1. Provide a visualization of your selections.
2. Include a trendline in your visualization.
Analyze outcomes using data. Interpret your graph tell the story of your data. Describe what the data is telling you based on the visualization. Discuss what you learned from the data.
1. Describe the trend (the data outcome).
2. Explain the meaning that you can take from the data.
3. Discuss how data interpretation like this can be used for clinical decision making.

What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit the following:

Innovation Presentation
Your submission should be an 8-to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation including title and reference slides and speaker notes. Include three sources to support your claims. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Supporting Materials

The following resources support your work on the project:

Resource:

Reading:
This Microsoft-provided tutorial should be used as a reference when working on your visualizations.

Project Two Rubric

Criteria	Exceeds Expectations (100%)	Meets Expectations (90%)	Partially Meets Expectations (70%)	Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)	Value
Incorporate a Proactive Systems Assessment	Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language	Conducts SWOT analysis on one of the listed innovations	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions	Does not attempt criterion	15
Incorporate a Reactive Systems Assessment	Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language	Completes root cause analysis including necessary components	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions	Does not attempt criterion	15
Determine a Quality Improvement Model for an Evaluation of Outcomes	Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language	Explains how root cause analysis applies to the quality improvement process within the framework of chosen quality improvement model	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions	Does not attempt criterion	15
Identify Trends in the Data	Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language	Provides visualization of data, including a trendline	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions	Does not attempt criterion	15
Analyze Outcomes Using Data	Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific language	Discusses what was learned from data, including all necessary components	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions	Does not attempt criterion	15
Clear Communication	Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding	Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience	Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding	Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication	10
Scholarly Sources	Incorporates more than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightful	Incorporates three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claims	Incorporates fewer than three scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claims	Does not incorporate sources	10
APA Style	Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errors	Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errors	Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errors	Does not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style	5

WRITE MY PAPER

NUR531 Project 2: Apply a systems theory leadership approach…