Your literature review must be organized by themes/debates (not a list of author-by-author summaries) and it must end with a clear gap what my study will do bridge to your own project.
Instructions: Upload one PDF that includes Sections AD in this order:
A. Literature Review Draft (60 points)
Length: 610 pages (double-spaced, 12-pt font, 1-inch margins) not counting references/appendix
Sources: Minimum 12 scholarly sources (peer-reviewed journal articles and/or reputable working papers such as NBER/IZA/World Bank)
Required Structure
1) Introduction (121 page)
- State your research question clearly (one sentence).
- Define the scope (what you include vs. do not include).
- Provide a roadmap of your themes (24 themes you will use).
2) Theme Sections (47 pages total) (organized by themes, not authors)
Each theme section must include:
- What the literature generally finds.
- Where evidence is mixed and why (measurement, context, data, identification strategy, time period).
- Boundary conditions (for whom/where/when results change).
- A few anchor studies discussed with more depth (data + method + key findings).
3) Gap + Contribution Bridge (121 page)
End with a clear explanation of:
- What gap exists in the literature.
- What your study will do to address it (setting, variables, identification idea, mechanism, or dataset).
4) References (required)
- Use a consistent citation style (APA, Chicago, etc.).
- Non-negotiable standard: If you cite it, you must have opened it and verified it.
B. Synthesis Evidence (25 points)
Include your most current versions of the following:
B1. Updated Synthesis Matrix (15 points)
Minimum 12 rows (one per final source). Must include:
- Theme bucket
- Setting/context
- Data
- Method/identification strategy
- Key results
- Limitations
- Implication for my model/specification
B2. Updated Thematic Outline (10 points)
12 pages that clearly matches the structure of your written draft.
C. Revision Memo (10 points) (1 page)
Include:
- 3 strengths of your current draft (specific).
- 3 targeted revision goals for your next draft (what you will change and how).
- 1 paragraph explaining how your organization supports your argument.
I have attached a previous assignment to use for the literature review. Only use the sources from the “Links for sources pdf”
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): RE3.pdf, Links for sources.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.