Evaluation of health intervention plan with technology

Evaluation of plan design: Once an intervention is planned and implemented it is important to evaluate the degree to which the outcomes of the project were achieved. By evaluating the desired outcomes of an intervention, it is possible to make more informed decisions about opportunities for continuous improvement. It is also possible to identify strategies and approaches that could be useful in improving one’s personal practice in other contexts or care areas. What specific piece or pieces of technology did you propose using in your implementation plan? How did the type of technology you chose impact the development of your implementation plan? How will the incorporation of the technology you propose make your implementation plan more successful? Part 1: Evaluation of plan Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan. Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need. Part 2: Discussion Advocacy Analyze the nurse’s role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care. Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan. Future Steps Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety. Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions. Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts. Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of an evaluation plan for an intervention, as well as for professional discussion about the plan. Communicate evaluation plan and discussion of the project in a professional way that helps the audience to understand how the outcomes will be evaluated, as well as what was learned through the project process. Length of submission: 46 double-spaced pages. Number of resources: 36 resources. (You may use resources previously cited in your literature review to contribute to this number. Your final project will require 1218 unique resources.) Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Header formatting follows current APA levels. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.