Discussion

below is the topic please do a discussion post and also below please also respond to the two discussion post as well. and rubric is below to use the website that is posted to use is below Visuals can be used both during a presentation to support the narrative or be used offline for others to view, interpret, and utilize. Both scenarios run the risk of misinterpretation. In this discussion, you will evaluate good and bad visuals, share your thoughts, and respond to your peers. Refer to the website Information is Beautiful and select two visuals of your choice. Then, in your initial post, address the following for each visual: Can this visual be used without any narrative to ensure a common message is derived? Does it tell a clear or misleading story? Why is this important? If the visual is misleading, describe how so. What type of misinterpretation could occur? If you think it is a good visual, what makes this visual good? Is it easy to understand? Does it illustrate complex information succinctly? Based on this evaluation and your own experience, explain what steps you will consider when making your own visualization choices. In your response to two peers, choose posts that describe different visuals from your own post. Then, address the following: Share your views on the choice made by your peers and their evaluation of the chosen visuals. Do you agree with their assessment? Explain.Share any other factors or tips you have for creating great visualizations. To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Partially Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Value Comprehension Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail (90%) Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (70%) Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) 20 Timeliness N/A Submits initial post on time (100%) Submits initial post one day late (70%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) 10 Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (90%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (70%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) 20 Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%) Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (90%) Draws logical conclusions (70%) Does not draw logical conclusions (0%) 30 Clear Communication Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding (100%) Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience (90%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding (70%) Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication (0%) 10 Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors (100%) Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors (90%) Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors (70%) Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution (0%) 10 Total: