Case study

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse Content & Critical Thinking

50 ptsExemplaryLearner responds to all prompts with no more than 5 sentences each. Responses are detailed and show a deep understanding of the topic. No key details are missing.45 ptsProficientLearner responds to all prompts in 3-5 sentences. Responses show good understanding and accuracy but may lack one key detail for completeness.

40 ptsCompetentLearner responds to all prompts in at least 3 sentences. Responses show basic understanding and clarity but are missing up to two key details for completeness.35 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearner provides limited responses. Responses are under 3 sentences or incomplete, or missing three or more key details.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing, unclear, or inaccurate.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Evidence

20 ptsExemplaryLearner supports the responses with seamlessly integrated, relevant, and current evidence that enhances the credibility and strength of the work without interrupting the flow of writing. Uses more than 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.18 ptsProficientLearner supports the responses with well-integrated, relevant and current evidence that provides support, is cited clearly, and contributes to the credibility of the work. Citations may cause minor interruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.

16 ptsCompetentLearner supports the responses with integrated, relevant, and current evidence that mostly supports the work, with occasional disruptions to the flow of writing. Uses at least 2 scholarly sources that are published within the past five years.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners evidence is poorly integrated into the responses, causing significant disruptions to the flow of writing. Evidence is not relevant or current. Scholarly resources provided do not meet requirements.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners presentation lacks support and evidence.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Professional Voice

20 ptsExemplaryLearners assignment is well-organized and fully adheres to submission guidelines. Formatting is professional and enhances readability. Tone is professional, considerate of differing viewpoints, and engaging.18 ptsProficientLearners assignment is organized, and formatting follows submission guidelines. Tone is generally professional and considerate of other viewpoints, with minor lapses.

16 ptsCompetentLearners assignment is adequately structured but has some organizational weaknesses. Formatting meets basic submission requirements. Tone contains occasional lapses in professionalism or limited engagement with different viewpoints.14 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe document has noticeable organizational issues, making it difficult to follow. Formatting is inconsistent or does not fully meet submission guidelines. Tone is inconsistent in professionalism and engagement or lacks respect for differing viewpoints.0 ptsNot EvidentThe document lacks clear structure and organization. Formatting is missing or does not follow submission guidelines. Tone is unprofessional and lacks respect for differing viewpoints.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Style

10 ptsExemplaryLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses are free from grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.9 ptsProficientLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references in APA format listed at the end of the document. Responses have 1-3 differing grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

8 ptsCompetentLearners responses include in-text citations with corresponding references listed in APA format at the end of the document. Responses have 4-6 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.7 ptsNeeds ImprovementLearners responses are missing in-text citations. References may be listed at the end of the document in APA format. Responses have 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.0 ptsNot EvidentLearners responses are missing in-text citations and corresponding references at the end of the paper. Responses have more than 7 different grammatical, spelling, and/or APA formatting errors.

10 pts