360-degree feedback assessment-Reflection (10%)

360-degree feedback assessment-Reflection (10%)

Hide Assignment Information

Instructions

This assignment is worth 10% of your final grade.

Assignment Overview:

For this assessment, you will demonstrate your skills relating to the outcome: Gather, respond to, and provide feedback to enhance professional growth.

Instructions:

After the facilitation assignment, you used a peer review application to give feedback to your assigned peers. When you received feedback from peers, you rated how helpful their feedback was.

For this assignment, you will reflect on your feedback given and received and your growth over the course of the assignment and the feedback exercise.

When writing your reflection, you should include:

1. A description of the feedback situation (clearly identify who, what, when, where, and why feedback was given.)

2. A thorough, specific, and detailed description of the feedback received, including to what extent you felt your three questions were answered.

3. A thoughtful and insightful analysis of the feedback you received that shows depth of learning.

4. A plan for improvement (Set ONE goal and NO MORE THAN THREE concrete steps for how to improve in the future).

Materials or Resources needed:

Refer back to the facilitation videos and to the feedback on FeedbackFruits. You should refer to this feedback in your reflection.

How to submit for evaluation:

Reflection will be submitted on Brightspace

Marking Guidelines:

See attached rubric

Due on Mar 15, 2026 11:59 PM

Available on Feb 9, 2026 7:00 AM. Access restricted before availability starts.

Available until Mar 15, 2026 11:59 PM. Access restricted after availability ends.

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: 360-Degree Feedback

Criteria

Exceeds Expectation

3 points

Meets Expectations

2 points

Needs improvement

1 point

Unable to Assess

0 points

Criterion Score

Description of the feedback situation

Clearly identifies who, what, when, where, and why feedback was given

The feedback description is described clearly, but is missing a detail

The feedback situation is unclear or is too generic

There is insufficient evidence to assess or there are unresolved concerns about academic misconduct

Score of Description of the feedback situation,

/ 3

Description of the feedback received

Description of the feedback received is detailed, specific, and thorough

Description of the feedback received is specific and includes some detail

Description of the feedback received is general, vague, and/or shallow

There is insufficient evidence to assess or there are unresolved concerns about academic misconduct

Score of Description of the feedback received,

/ 3

Analysis of feedback received

Analysis is thoughtful, insightful, and shows depth of learning

Analysis shows careful consideration of the feedback and what can be learned from it

Analysis is shallow or shows resistance to considering the feedback

There is insufficient evidence to assess or there are unresolved concerns about academic misconduct

Score of Analysis of feedback received,

/ 3

Plans for improvement

Sets a goal and concrete steps for how to improve

Sets a goal and includes a general plan for improvement

Doesnt set a goal or does not have a clear plan for improvement

There is insufficient evidence to assess or there are unresolved concerns about academic misconduct

Score of Plans for improvement,

/ 3

Total

Score of 360-Degree Feedback,

/ 12

Overall Score

Level 4

11 points minimum

Level 3

8 points minimum

Level 2

5 points minimum

Level 1

COMM2202 Facilitation Feedback Questions:

My questions I asked for feedback on:

1. How did I start the discussion? Was I clear with my points? What could I

have done at the start of the discussion to make the conversation flow

more smoothly?

2. Did I hand my interruptions/disagreements well during the discussion?

Were there times where I could have done better keep the conversation

focussed on the main topic?

3. How did I do in terms of keeping the discussion on track and helping the

group reach a conclusion? Is there anything I can improve in the next

discussion?

First group members feedback for first all three questions

1) personally think you introduced the topic really well. You were clear with the concern, and left us to debate the outcome. I think instead of repeating how we should handle the situation, summing up our points against the outcome I think would show which outcome is stronger

2) During the conversation we never strayed from the main problem, and all topics had a meaning to it’s presence in the conversation. I felt as if you mostly agreed with the last person who spoke. I think joining in the debate and saying “I agree, but” to actively engage with both sides and understood both point of views.

3) You kept it clear that you were seeking advice on what measures you were wanting to take when we had just started talking about frustrations. I think for future meetings you could sum up your colleges points against the conclusion to see how strong the outcome is.

Second group members feedback for first all three questions

1) You started the discussion by giving a quick overview of the topic, which helped set the stage for the discussion. This helped set the stage for the discussion and what you were looking for from the discussion. A way to create a smoother discussion would be to be even more explicit about the goals for the conversation to create more of a guideline from the conversation.

2) You handled interruptions and disagreements calmly and did not let them turn into debates. As a participant I feel this helped the conversation feel respectful and kept people comfortable sharing their ideas. An area of improvement could be stepping in a bit sooner when their were interruptions to keep the conversation on track.

3) You did a great job bringing the group back when it got off topic. One thing you could do to make your facilitation stronger is being more explicit when the group is getting closer to a conclusion and guiding us toward wrapping up the conversation.

Third group members feedback for first all three questions

1) One thing you did well at the start of the discussion was clearly introducing the topic and outlining the main focus of the meeting. That helped me understand the purpose of the conversation right away and feel prepared to participate. One area of improvement would be adding a brief opening question to ease into the discussion. That could have helped the conversation feel more natural from the beginning and encouraged earlier participation.

2) One thing you did well was handling interruptions and disagreements calmly and respectfully. You allowed different perspectives to be shared without shutting anyone down, which helped maintain a safe and open environment. One area of improvement would be redirecting the conversation back to the main topic when it started to drift off. Briefly summarizing the point made and the linking it back to the central question could have helped the discussion stay more focused.

3) One thing you did well was consistently guiding the conversation back even if the distractor was trying to make it go off track. That made it easier to follow the flow and understand how each point contributed to the overall topic. One area of improvement would be spending a bit more time going over the key ideas at the end to clearly highlight the group’s conclusion. Doing so would make the discussion feel more complete and ensure everyone leaves with an understanding on the main takeaways that were brought up.